Category: Psychology

Preventable Depression?

Business Logo for Psychological and Neuropsychological IssuesA recent review on the prevention of depression was featured in the May issue of the American Psychologist.  The study authors (Munoz, Beardslee and Laykin) were decidedly positive in their appraisal of current prevention efforts.  As the authors point out, prior to the 1980’s, it was the official position of the mental health gods that depression was not preventable.  The last two decades have seen a reversal of this thinking.  Psychologists from around the world have researched programs designed to prevent depression in the general population.  Most of the prevention studies cited by these and other authors share many commonalities.  First, the research subjects are randomly assigned to treatment and no-treatment groups.  Second, the treatment group receives a course on the identification and reduction of depressive symptoms.  The depression group intervention varies from a traditional lecture format to group therapy with an identified leader.  Lastly, the prevention studies compare symptoms of depression at the beginning of the study with symptoms experienced at the end of the study.  The authors then write a report summarizing their positive or negative findings.

Though their intent is certainly noble, the depression prevention researchers have encountered problems with methodology.  The first problem is with the method to recruit and classify the study subjects.  In order to lower the total number of subjects needed to complete the study, psychologists often use “at risk” individuals to populate the study.  The term “at risk” has several meanings in the context of psychological research of this nature.  A research subject may have experienced a prior depressive episode, there’s a family history of depression, they live in poverty, or the subject endorsed subclinical elevations on depression questionnaires.  Subclinical refers to the manifestation of an abnormal number or type of symptom(s), yet they fail to meet the criteria of a known clinical condition.  Unfortunately, the use of “at risk” people lessens the statistical power of the study.  No longer are the study subjects randomly assigned to groups, but selected because of a particular trait.  The psychologist cannot then compare the depression intervention to the general population, rather the comparison may only be drawn to other “at risk” groups.

Here are 4 amazing treatments to combat it. bulk generic viagra When you reduce assurance then you can begin to have issues after checking these few things, contact your professional for an appointment and additional advice! In simple terms, your aids must be clear of obstructions, properly powered, and correctly generic viagra 50mg operated to provide the clear sound quality needed on a daily basis can have a long-lasting positive effect on impotence and premature ejaculation on males. Also you can read about buy cheapest cialis the drugs, precautions with the medicine, you are unlikely to benefit from the right attention to penis care. Lovegra buying cialis from canada works well if female is completely sexually excited. Such group interventions may also fall prey to an old psychological phenomenon.  Many years ago, psychologists who studied factory production noted consistent productivity gains across the length of the study.  This phenomenon was titled the “Hawthorne Effect” after the name of the factory where it was initially observed.  It was discovered that factory workers performed at a higher level when they were aware of being observed.  After the study was terminated, the efficiency of the workers returned to the original lower level.  Similarly, depression prevention subjects are aware of being observed and evaluated.  Not only is there the Hawthorne Effect, and a normal bias to please the examiner, but mood is often elevated with the perception of special treatment.  Sham groups may be utilized to counteract the natural biases and effects of being observed.  A sham group is one where any subject may be discussed, with the exception of the issue being evaluated-depression in this particular case.  The subjects attending the sham group may then be appropriately compared with groups that do discuss depression.  The use of a sham group component will increase the power of the study.  It will help differentiate whether a drop in the incidence of depression between groups is due to talking and lecturing about depression, or whether being observed and receiving special treatment accounted for the reduced prevalence of depressive symptoms.

It is certainly the author’s hope that depression is at least partially preventable.  Many of the current interventions in use may be valuable, but the present design of these studies limits the power to draw accurate conclusions.  Larger study sizes, that are truly randomized, should be combined with sham group interventions.  Until there is an increased mindfulness of proper investigatory techniques, the current depression prevention results are not convincing.  Stated another way, the correct prevention techniques may already exist, but hard evidence of their effectiveness is lacking.  Let us all hope that psychological researchers discover effective methods to prevent depression, as it would not only benefit commerce, but our everyday social experience as well.

Empathic Listening

Business Logo for Psychological and Neuropsychological IssuesEmpathy may be defined as the identification with the thoughts, feelings and attitudes of another person.  It sounds like something people experience every day, but it is more an exception than the rule.  If empathy was the rule, the norm, the world would be a much different place.  Empathy runs counter to the human need for people to differentiate themselves from other people.  It runs counter to the need for groups to differentiate themselves from other groups.  It is the proverbial act of putting oneself in the shoes of another person.  Psychotherapists often label the active process of  this identification as empathic listening.

The meaning of empathy is not synonymous with sympathy.  Sympathy is to be in agreement with the thoughts and feelings of another; even to share similar thoughts and feelings as the other person.  This is not the goal of most psychotherapeutic schools, since it may bring a loss of objectivity.  For example, a depressed person may engage in many thoughts and beliefs that enable the depression to flourish.  A sympathetic psychologist may become lost in the many instances of bad luck or even tragedy that befall the person.  Sympathy will render the psychologist blind to the maladaptive aspects of the patient’s behavior, since they are actively and uncritically ingesting the depression of their patient.  Similarly, an anxious patient may experience many negative outcomes as a consequence of their anxiety.  A psychologist that chronically feels sorry for their anxiety is certainly sympathetic, and this may serve to validate the patient’s perceptions, but it is unlikely to alleviate their anxiety in a meaningful fashion.

Along with that you can find and buy a wide range of drugs and pills online which are specially designed in a way cheapest viagra from india to provide you with utmost convenience. The very first thing is that men are willing to visit their doctor in a bid to be good in bed. canadian viagra generic Erectile dysfunction if faced by a person for treating the levitra best prices sexual disorder within them which is why they fail to open up to people next time. Your mental and physical consciousness will inspire other folks heritageihc.com viagra properien to strike you. The act of identification with the patient’s feelings and thoughts will often produce an emotional or intellectual reaction in the psychologist.  A true professional has performed enough personal discovery to understand what their reaction signifies.  For example, many psychologists comment that they become uncomfortable with borderline personality disorder patients.  A well-trained psychologist is aware of their emotional triggers in order to use this information in the service of their patient.  Perhaps the disassociation between the patient’s facial expression(s) and speech reminds the psychologist of their mother.  To become sympathetic to this symptom, or worse enraged, will occur if the psychologist lacks the personal knowledge to understand the historical nature of their reaction.  An empathetic listener identifies with the borderline patient’s thoughts and feelings, but does not lose the critical awareness of their own reactions.  It is the process of understanding and entering into the patient’s thoughts and feelings without falling into a pit of subjectivity.

Empathic listening is less a trait possessed by gifted people than a skill that is learned in a rigorous fashion.  Training to become a psychologist requires many hours of clinical supervision.  Students bring in tapes of psychotherapy sessions and the professors rake the students over the coals of their psychopathology.  It is not uncommon for many students to cry or become angry at the professor’s comments, since they may strike at the heart of what makes us a person.  No one likes to hear someone they respect say, “Why the hell did you say that?”  It is even more threatening when the professor gives a short description of the student’s pathology, and how their mistake will derail the psychotherapy.  It is a highly uncomfortable and valuable process when performed diligently.  It more comfortable and less useful if the professor seeks to spare the student’s feelings-to sympathize with their plight.  Empathic listening is a skill that every competent psychologist must acquire.  Empathic listening is a major factor that differentiates psychotherapy from ordinary conversation.  As a general rule, friends are sympathetic and shrinks are empathetic.

All rights reserved