It is not uncommon for psychologists to draw parallels between the modern computer and the ancient human brain. Nearly all the people who read this article will do so with the use of a computer. The computer allows the rapid categorization and transformation of symbolic information. The information is symbolic since it does not contain the actual perceptual information of the event, but a representation of the information encoded into standardized symbols. The symbols must be standardized, or the information could not be shared with others. The symbols must also have the capacity of accurate storage, or the computer would only be useful on an intermittent and spontaneous basis.
The ancient brain processes sensory information in a symbolic fashion, as well. It does not store holograms of what we see, smell, hear or touch, but encodes the information in proteins. Recalling the information encoded in proteins allows categorization and association of the symbols removed from the actual event. The human brain uses standardized sounds to communicate its symbols, otherwise the information could not be shared with others. The storage of symbolic information must be fairly accurate, or the human could not learn to operate effectively within a given environment.
Both the brain and computer have an architecture specialized to encode and process information, yet there are differences. There is no real equivalent of software in the human brain, as the physical architecture of the brain is altered to meet and master novel tasks. Current computers cannot alter their architecture at this point in their development, but small alterations of software can radically change the type and method of information processed. Neurotransmitters provide the closest parallel to computer software. Their respective levels in different areas of the brain may favor and flavor the information processed. The current understanding of neurotransmitter action does not allow for the sweeping changes possible with computer software. The human brain exists in a dynamic flowing relationship with the environment, whereas the computer was designed to be an assistant in this relationship.
Be sure that you cialis 20mg tadalafil check prices before you make your purchase. Yet, cost of levitra from india http://respitecaresa.org/parents-corner/registration-packet-pdf/ is cut down than the monetary outlay of levitra. Impotence problems (ED) will be some sort of artery blockage that sildenafil tablets is preventing arousal during sexual stimulation. Well, unlike many other health conditions, male erectile dysfunction is diagnosing the disease. sildenafil canada online
Currently, mental illness is most often viewed as a biological defect; similar to a diseased heart or lung. Computer scientists might regard schizophrenia and bipolar disorder as faulty hardware, and depression, anxiety and angst as buggy software. Similarly, psychosurgery has been used in the past to treat schizophrenia, and current psychiatrists modulate neurotransmitters to control depression. The former deserves little comment, and the latter has met with limited success. Neuroscientists and psychiatrists have beaten the drum of biological mental illness for decades. They have attempted changing the computer architecture in schizophrenia, and the computer software in depression. The analogy tends to fail at this point, though, largely due to the negligence of a very important relationship.
The analogy breaks down due to the dynamic relationship between humans and the environment. A person’s environment, especially their social milieu, may profoundly alter neurotransmitter levels. Chronic stress is now known to cause actual alterations in the way genes are expressed. Put another way, the environment alters the hardware and software of the human brain. The brain evolves over a lifetime, whereas the computer is largely a static entity, such that the computer/brain analogy is always inexact. To ignore the environment in the treatment of mental illness is similar to ignoring the road while driving a car. Altering the brain’s software, without altering the environment, is to ignore a major difference between computers and people. Social relationships may be an architect of human dysfunction, but also a foundation upon which we build our happiness.
Tags: Angst, Anxiety, bipolar, Bipolar Disorder, Depression, schizophrenia
Angst, Anxiety, Bipolar (manic depression), Depression, Psychology | orlandopsychcom |
July 6, 2012 1:43 pm |
Comments Off on Computers on the Brain
The use of legal psychoactive drugs has increased twenty two percent in the nine years between 2001 and 2010. This is a truly staggering increase. Most of the increased prescribing is performed by general practitioners-not psychiatric physicians. Most people do not realize that psychiatrists attend medical school like other physicians. After they graduate, psychiatrists receive special training within the field of mental health. Non-psychiatric physicians have a few months of study and clinical training in mental health. This is not intended to demean medically oriented physicians. One can master only so much in a limited amount of time. Most of the problem is not the limited training of physicians, rather it is the beliefs held by the public at large.
Many medically-oriented physicians believe particular patients would gain more from psychotherapy than medication; however, most patients are taken aback by a psychology referral. Patients may believe that the doctor secretly thinks they are crazy or beyond the help of medication(s). In addition, most people believe that psychotherapy takes years, or even a lifetime, to be effective. It evokes images of the psychoanalytic couch, or worse, the snake pit of inpatient treatment. Perhaps the psychologist will discover a hidden psychosis; a primal fear of many normal people. Perhaps the psychologist seeks to relive one’s horrid memories until they are no longer able to function. What about the fear of entrusted secrets to a near stranger? Perhaps the psychologist discusses their crazy patients as entertainment. Once the information is poured out of the bottle, who can say where all the drops will collect.
The beliefs of many psychologists may also interfere with the use of psychotherapy over medications. A lauded professor of psychology, as well as practicing clinician, bemoaned the invention of Prozac as the death of psychotherapy. This was bemoaned in 1990, long before the limitations and risks of the new antidepressants became known. It is often difficult for the clinician to see progress in some patients, such that the use of a magic substance is very attractive. The doctor would feel more secure and effective with something that promises to accelerate the relief experienced in the office. Early research suggested that psychotherapy is only effective for mild cases of anxiety or depression, and many clinicians still believe this to be true. If medication was truly more effective than psychotherapy, psychologists would be guilty of misleading the public at large. The outpatient practice of psychotherapy would effectively be a conspiracy against the public.
Therefore whenever your impotency affected body wants to avail back your spontaneous strength and stamina that can make him cost of sildenafil able to feel the warmth of love. levitra 50mg When all of these indicators appear, a blood sugar is typically over More than 200 mg of cholesterol per day. If, you count buy professional viagra undoubtedly one of the men that were suffering from ED had gum disease, compared with 23% whose gums were completely healthy. cheapest viagra uk Gulp the pills at once never ever over intake the drugs in any manner as it may bring worst side-effects.
Perhaps the easiest explanation for the rise of drug treatment is that insurance reimbursement for psychotherapy is lower and harder to obtain than that for drugs. From the mid 1990’s to the mid 2000’s, the drug companies tripled their marketing of psychoactive drugs. It has shaped the perceptions of the American public, and likely many professionals as well. The drug companies do not have to make deceitful claims about their products. Saturating the airwaves with pictures of happy attractive people taking their medications is sufficient to mold the unconscious mind. Saturating the airwaves with happy attractive psychotherapy patients is not likely to occur in the near or distant future. No one individual or company would profit from the endeavor. There is no market pressure to push psychotherapy, such that it is shoved to the sidelines.
Convincing people to buy what they don’t need is at the center of American marketing genius. The public apprehension regarding psychotherapy and psychologists energizes and assists the marketing of drugs. Few patients weigh the benefits of psychotherapy over medication, since they are not presented with useful information. Just as the nation woke from a Valium haze in the 80’s, the public is beginning to realize it has been oversold. Wake up and evaluate the options for mental health treatment-you may be pleasantly surprised.